Og Mudbone Yahoo Questions

GIUSTIZIA E DINTORNI

Dear readers

the recent crisis Governo dovrebbe contribuire a mettere in luce un aspetto inquietante della vita pubblica italiana, che non riguarda la politica in senso stratto bensì un importante organo dello Stato. Sto parlando della magistratura.

Ricordate quando il gip di Milano Clementina Forleo richiese al Parlamento l'autorizzazione ad usare intercettazioni telefoniche, con toni talmente duri che le valsero un richiamo dal Capo dello Stato? E ricordate quando la stessa andò in televisione da Michele Santoro ad esporre il suo punto di vista? E ricordate la presenza, nel programma del già citato conduttore, del signor Luigi De Magistris (photo), who had trained a practice that touched even Prime Minister Romano Prodi and Justice Minister Clemente Mastella ? Palsy precisely the same De Magistris challenged by the Council of the Judiciary to conduct the investigation, and moved to place and activity.

Cara Judiciary, the same as that sinks in the Naples waste finds nothing better to do than to educate yet another practice against Berlusconi.

Finally, here is the prosecutor in Santa Maria Capua Vetere investigating a beautiful investigation into the Minister Mastella, his wife and his party, with much of the usual telephone interccetazioni that rages on the usual newspapers. And okay, not the prosecutor the right to instruct an investigation?, Ask my 25 readers. And here comes the fun part.

Why in the last few days, two prominent views foreshadow doubts about how the action was carried out.

The first, to Gerardo D'Ambrosio, a former pm "Clean Hands", which glosses in no uncertain terms: "'a serious matter that a court retains a measure for three months and then that it lacked jurisdiction to issue a precautionary measure. But how? " Adds poiriferendosi under house arrest di Sandra Mastella :" L'urgenza si giustifica per evitare la fuga o la reiterazione del reato, e per questo comprendo la reazione di Mastella: la prova della tentata concussione non poteva essere inquinata, perchè trattasi di intercettazione già agli atti " ( Corriere della Sera, 24/01/2008 ).

Il secondo, quello del Vicepresidente del Csm Nicola Mancino , il quale afferma: " Personalmente ritengo che non ci fossero quelle condizioni che legittimano la custodia cautelare " ( see here )

hell broke loose! Do not want to get accurate exterior Saverio Borrelli, according to which "The '92 is never finished, the weather is always the same" and also "The reactions of the political class are in conflict with the principle that all are equal before the law "(read more ).

Too bad this time to make such allegations is not Berlusconi, nor the Minister of Justice, nor any politician. This time they are two eminent judges, people who knows the law. But the range to explain to Mr. Borrelli.